David Kaye
2016-11-14 11:34:18 UTC
I'm currently using Amazon's S3 for serving video files. As things ramp up
Amazon may become too expensive. I need minimum redundancy (if the file is
temporarily offline it'll hurt a little but it won't be bad). I don't care
where the storage is. I would need to serve about 10TB per month, though
this would likely increase within a few months. I don't care if the upload
is web interface or FTP, and privacy doesn't matter. My main concern is
price, followed by whether the company will still be in business in a couple
years.
Ideas anyone?
Amazon may become too expensive. I need minimum redundancy (if the file is
temporarily offline it'll hurt a little but it won't be bad). I don't care
where the storage is. I would need to serve about 10TB per month, though
this would likely increase within a few months. I don't care if the upload
is web interface or FTP, and privacy doesn't matter. My main concern is
price, followed by whether the company will still be in business in a couple
years.
Ideas anyone?